asimplechord: (colored solutions)
[personal profile] asimplechord
But still! A little originality would be nice.

If I see one more newly sanctioned use of -ome, I'll scream.

Genome, proteome, proteasome, fine. Whatever.

Transcriptome? Meh.

Receptosome? *starts to frown*

Metallome? Oh, Tom O'Halloran, you get all the blame credit for that ridiculous thing.

NOBOnome? Lame.

And interactome? That is IT. NO MORE. I have decreed it. So must it be. In my little world, anyway.

And while we're at it? Ligand = noun. NOT A VERB. A small molecule doesn't ligand something; EDTA doesn't ligand a zinc or calcium ion. It ligates.

*twitch*

We now return to our regularly scheduled lab work.

Date: 2007-08-10 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com
Those are just the ones I've heard recently. I hate them. The -ome seems to be used indiscriminately nowadays.

Is the trypsin/other peptidases naming convention a historical thing? They were named before rules had been decided?

Date: 2007-08-11 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angela-snape.livejournal.com
It's possible. I haven't looked into the history of biochemical naming or anything, but when I tell my students "ase" means enzyme in one breath and then introduce those peptidases (at least that ends in 'ase') I just say there are exceptions to every rule. *shrug*

Profile

asimplechord: (Default)
asimplechord

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 18th, 2025 03:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios