asimplechord: (colored solutions)
[personal profile] asimplechord
But still! A little originality would be nice.

If I see one more newly sanctioned use of -ome, I'll scream.

Genome, proteome, proteasome, fine. Whatever.

Transcriptome? Meh.

Receptosome? *starts to frown*

Metallome? Oh, Tom O'Halloran, you get all the blame credit for that ridiculous thing.

NOBOnome? Lame.

And interactome? That is IT. NO MORE. I have decreed it. So must it be. In my little world, anyway.

And while we're at it? Ligand = noun. NOT A VERB. A small molecule doesn't ligand something; EDTA doesn't ligand a zinc or calcium ion. It ligates.

*twitch*

We now return to our regularly scheduled lab work.

Date: 2007-08-08 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiralove.livejournal.com
*iz guilty of working on an -ome*

Date: 2007-08-08 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com
*squinty eyes*

One of the aforementioned? Or an additional one? :)

Date: 2007-08-08 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiralove.livejournal.com
... an additional one ... :)

Date: 2007-08-08 09:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilyeyes.livejournal.com
*snickers* love the words people make up - just did our shift bidding for the next 4 months and had to determine who was 'bumpable' who could be displaced from their current shift by someone junior to them. bumpable ???

Date: 2007-08-09 06:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com
Um, a junior person can bump a senior person? Is that for budgetary reasons?

Date: 2007-08-09 09:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilyeyes.livejournal.com
No - in their infinate wisdom, it is thought this will keep someone from quitting because they can't get off graveyard shift. Everyone else does it strickly by senority - go figure!

Date: 2007-08-09 04:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] topaz7.livejournal.com
Aren't there rules about wording things? Like -ase means it's an enzyme? I thought you science-y types were all about the rules.

I find this all very confusome.

Date: 2007-08-09 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com
Enzyme have a naming and numbering system. Gene-naming is NOT systematic, and people who work in the Drosophila field go out of their way to make up crazy names. I mean, seriously, fuzzy onions as a gene name? hedgehog? Right.

The -ome thing is another thing where people started using it without rules, and it's gotten out of hand.

Date: 2007-08-09 10:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angela-snape.livejournal.com
I've always thought that nomenclature should have rules - it bothers me when most enzymes end in "ase", but then there's pepsin, trypsin, etc. that don't. Can't we just be consistent?

And some of those "ome"s?? Sound ridiculous.

Date: 2007-08-10 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com
Those are just the ones I've heard recently. I hate them. The -ome seems to be used indiscriminately nowadays.

Is the trypsin/other peptidases naming convention a historical thing? They were named before rules had been decided?

Date: 2007-08-11 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angela-snape.livejournal.com
It's possible. I haven't looked into the history of biochemical naming or anything, but when I tell my students "ase" means enzyme in one breath and then introduce those peptidases (at least that ends in 'ase') I just say there are exceptions to every rule. *shrug*

Profile

asimplechord: (Default)
asimplechord

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 05:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios