the obligatory DH post
Jul. 23rd, 2007 03:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, I've been mostly away from LJ since reading Deathly Hallows, and I'm sure some of this has been covered elsewhere, so if you can point me to the appropriate discussion, I'd appreciate it.
Overall, I liked the book. At a few points, I felt like I was reading something I'd read before, but that's what I get for reading so much fanfic, right? How many different ways could the trio hunt Horcruxes that didn't involve Grimmauld Place and camping all over the UK?
I didn't care for the Deathly Hallows as a plot device any more than I cared for the Horcruxes, but at least there were only three of them.
Enjoyed the Dumbledore background, even if it was delivered in a cumbersome way. *Really* liked Aberforth. I feel vindicated by Snape's memories, seeing that Dumbledore really WAS as manipulative as I thought he was. Using people "for the greater good" is still using them.
I'm not going to argue about Snape's death. I always assumed he would die in the end, partly because of the way JKR talked about him and partly because it's easier for Harry post-war to not have to deal with Snape being both a hero and still *Snape*. And he had to die in a way that would make Harry willing to see his memories and believe them, rather than blowing them off because they were *Snape's*. I just wish we had seen more of Severus before his final departure.
I expected a Weasley to die. And I'm not surprised that one of the twins was the ultimate victim. What bothers me more than the simple fact that Fred was killed was the circumstances. Percy had just returned, and to focus on HIS grief, HIS presence, seems shallow and minor. He'd been gone for years, and he was less than approving of FnG before then. Yes, yes, it's to highlight his remorse. Doesn't work for me. I'd think that George's grief (or maybe Molly's, but she gets her own with Bellatrix later) is more significant. So for George to not even be there? *shakes head* Nuh-uh. At least the reaction Harry sees later is all George, unable to let go.
Not impressed with the epilogue. We already could figure out that Harry and Ginny would get back together. We didn't need the cute little scene (with our neglected hero now a perfectly well-adjusted parent himself) at King's Cross with Albus Severus (total overkill).
Two major questions:
1. Is it the magic of the Sorting Hat that allowed Gryffindor's Sword to appear for Neville, even after Griphook made off with it at Gringotts? Or was it somehow back in the castle because Gringotts was under the control of the Dark Lord?
2. I am confused about the Invisibility Cloak. (J, too, because she asked me this while I was still wondering.) In HBP, we see Draco Petrify Harry on the Express while he was hiding under the cloak. But in DH, the cloak is impervious to being summoned or hexed. Please to be explaining? I am recalling the HBP thing from memory, so maybe there's a detail I'm forgetting?
ETA: OH! And here's another thought. If the Potters really are descendents of Ignotus Peverell, could Harry have come by Parseltongue on his own, not a gift from Voldemort?
ETA2: Also discussed with J: what was the point of the "no Unforgivables from you, Potter" in HBP if Harry was just going to cut loose with Crucio in DH. With no repercussions, apparently?
Overall, I liked the book. At a few points, I felt like I was reading something I'd read before, but that's what I get for reading so much fanfic, right? How many different ways could the trio hunt Horcruxes that didn't involve Grimmauld Place and camping all over the UK?
I didn't care for the Deathly Hallows as a plot device any more than I cared for the Horcruxes, but at least there were only three of them.
Enjoyed the Dumbledore background, even if it was delivered in a cumbersome way. *Really* liked Aberforth. I feel vindicated by Snape's memories, seeing that Dumbledore really WAS as manipulative as I thought he was. Using people "for the greater good" is still using them.
I'm not going to argue about Snape's death. I always assumed he would die in the end, partly because of the way JKR talked about him and partly because it's easier for Harry post-war to not have to deal with Snape being both a hero and still *Snape*. And he had to die in a way that would make Harry willing to see his memories and believe them, rather than blowing them off because they were *Snape's*. I just wish we had seen more of Severus before his final departure.
I expected a Weasley to die. And I'm not surprised that one of the twins was the ultimate victim. What bothers me more than the simple fact that Fred was killed was the circumstances. Percy had just returned, and to focus on HIS grief, HIS presence, seems shallow and minor. He'd been gone for years, and he was less than approving of FnG before then. Yes, yes, it's to highlight his remorse. Doesn't work for me. I'd think that George's grief (or maybe Molly's, but she gets her own with Bellatrix later) is more significant. So for George to not even be there? *shakes head* Nuh-uh. At least the reaction Harry sees later is all George, unable to let go.
Not impressed with the epilogue. We already could figure out that Harry and Ginny would get back together. We didn't need the cute little scene (with our neglected hero now a perfectly well-adjusted parent himself) at King's Cross with Albus Severus (total overkill).
Two major questions:
1. Is it the magic of the Sorting Hat that allowed Gryffindor's Sword to appear for Neville, even after Griphook made off with it at Gringotts? Or was it somehow back in the castle because Gringotts was under the control of the Dark Lord?
2. I am confused about the Invisibility Cloak. (J, too, because she asked me this while I was still wondering.) In HBP, we see Draco Petrify Harry on the Express while he was hiding under the cloak. But in DH, the cloak is impervious to being summoned or hexed. Please to be explaining? I am recalling the HBP thing from memory, so maybe there's a detail I'm forgetting?
ETA: OH! And here's another thought. If the Potters really are descendents of Ignotus Peverell, could Harry have come by Parseltongue on his own, not a gift from Voldemort?
ETA2: Also discussed with J: what was the point of the "no Unforgivables from you, Potter" in HBP if Harry was just going to cut loose with Crucio in DH. With no repercussions, apparently?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:08 pm (UTC)And with the Invisibility Cloak, I think it was just a plot hole. I really felt the Hallows were ill thought-out and sort of last minute. I honestly don't think she intended it to be anything special until this particular book, for some reason. I could be totally wrong. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:31 pm (UTC)Eh. It was still good. Worth the money, worth the time. And it'll spawn tons and tons of new fanfic, and we have the pleasure of knowing we were right about Snape all along.
My first thought for fanfic? Who's to say that Harry wouldn't ever go back and look for the Stone he dropped in the Forest? :)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:20 pm (UTC)Yeah, we needed a George reaction.
Kind of how I felt about Snape's death. Been expecting it. I just thought it was a stupid death, in the scheme of things. Death for death's sake. (Hedwig's too, for that matter.)
I completely missed where, exactly Tonks died. And why wasn't Teddy living with Harry? (The whole Tonks/Lupin things was forced. Lupin's characterization was horrid.)
Accio Hagrid.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:26 pm (UTC)I assumed Tonks' death was "offscreen" while Harry was fighting elsewhere, because I don't remember that either. And I wondered that same thing, if Harry was Teddy's godfather. Was he being raised by Andromeda?
Urgh. That whole Lupin abandoning Tonks? So very OOC, it was unbelievable.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:30 pm (UTC)For that matter, why is Teddy at the Hogwarts Express if it's 19 years later... she should be done with Hogwarts, no?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 09:49 pm (UTC)Uh-huh.
Yeah, I'm guessing it's the magic of the Sorting Hat. That bit annoyed me too, a bit much for us to assume after the dramatics of the scene where Griphook doublecrosses them and they make their escape.
Yes, the invisibility cloak thing bugged me greatly! Harry was petrified, Moody could see him, Dumbledore saw him, Nagini saw him! Too many things wrong with that.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:02 pm (UTC)Sorry about your twincest. *hugs*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-23 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 04:08 am (UTC)Can someone tell me why Harry's eyes were so extraordinary, except for the fact they were 'Lily's eyes'?
I, too, would have liked to have seen a little more Snape/Harry interaction. If only for more snarled advice about keeping mouth and mind closed - neither of which Harry achieved.
I really really would have rathered Percy die instead of Fred.
Epilogue? What epilogue? My Snarry heart is already figuring out ways to stopper death!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 03:31 pm (UTC):D That stone out in the forest has to be good for something. Seriously.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 01:42 pm (UTC)I was also wondering what the deal with the Elder wand was--when Harry supposedly "mastered" the Elder Wand by disarming Draco, Draco wasn't using the Elder Wand. So is Harry merely supposed to disarm the owner, and then all wands under his control pass on to Harry? *shakes head at increasingly unwieldy an far fetched plot lines*
Was more convinced than ever after reading DH that Dumbledore was a manipulative git.
Hermione JEAN Granger??!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 03:29 pm (UTC)You totally just reminded me of that! When I saw it, I thought I was misreading it. Because I thought for sure her name was Hermione Jane according to the Lexicon. But then I got distracted and didn't go check.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:06 pm (UTC)Regarding the invisibility cloak, it makes sense that while it may be impervious to magic (like Accio), it doesn't protect whoever's underneath it - Dumbledore stopped Harry even though he was underneath it in HBP.
Overall, I liked it. The epilogue was too cutesy - I wanted to know things like what they did with their lives, and who the new headmaster was, if it had to be that far in the future. I would have preferred a memorial service for the people who died in the Hogwarts battle, or something. Who cares how many babies were produced by the Trio et. al.?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-26 12:34 pm (UTC)