words, words
May. 22nd, 2007 06:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For other science geeks out there:
Is "non-phosphorylatable" really a word? As in a serine to alanine mutation renders the amino acid unable to act as a kinase substrate.
Is "non-phosphorylatable" really a word? As in a serine to alanine mutation renders the amino acid unable to act as a kinase substrate.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-22 11:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 01:05 am (UTC)You don't know the answer to THAT??
8P
no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 08:21 pm (UTC)why use that when you could say that serine is phophorylated whereas alanine is not.
More words but clearer IMO
no subject
Date: 2007-05-23 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-24 12:39 am (UTC)if phosphorylate is a verb, use "non-phosphorylable", but
if phosphorylate is a noun, use "non-phosphorylatizable", because you can't stick "-able" on a noun.
Then again, there could be some extenuating chemistry. I'm not an expert there.