asimplechord: (trying to kill you with his mind)
asimplechord ([personal profile] asimplechord) wrote2010-10-07 02:22 pm
Entry tags:

Excuse me while I rant

From an Out interview re: slash fanfiction.

In Nasa/Trek: Popular Science and Sex in America, academic Constance Penley asks the obvious question: Why are women fans so alienated from their own bodies that they can write erotic fantasies only in relation to a non-female body? She surmises that perhaps men’s bodies are simply easier to fantasize with because they aren’t the legal, moral, religious battleground that women’s bodies are.

While I know organic sexual preferences are neither elective nor politically motivated, I couldn’t help but feel, as a heterosexual female, that there was something self-assassinating and a little bit politically disturbing about the M/M fiction I read.



I haven't read Penley's work before, and am not clear why this should be the direction the journalist takes this article.

But I have to ask... does anyone ask a straight man why he's so alienated from his body if he gets off on f/f porn? REALLY?


Once again, main-stream media makes fandom look stupid.

>>>>>:/

This entry was originally posted at http://favoritemistake.dreamwidth.org/6410.html.

[identity profile] enchanted-jae.livejournal.com 2010-10-08 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
Mainstream media just don't get it. Frankly, we shouldn't have to explain why it works for us; they can just sit there and wonder about it.

This brings to mind last year's Survey!Fail debacle, in which the "researchers" could only compare straight women's fascination with m/m erotica to a straight male being attracted to a transgendered person. It never frickin' occurred to them to compare it to the fascination straight men hold for f/f erotica. I wanted to knock their heads together and yell, "Big red truck!"

[identity profile] asimplechord.livejournal.com 2010-10-11 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
*sigh*

It's just so ridiculous that this sort of double standard still exists. Ridiculous and demoralizing.