asimplechord (
asimplechord) wrote2008-01-15 07:32 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
party queen, if you want to be seen
Dear AP,
Crap like this is why independent media gets my attention and my business.
How is that important? HOW?
No love and no respect,
Me
Also? I love KPFT and Democracy Now, but primary season isn't even over yet, and I am already tired of electioneering and such. Still. So much love for Gloria Steinem debating gender and race issues. Because instead of devolving into petty bickering, the participants actually, you know, communicated. I can't think any new dialogue between the two camps will make a difference in terms of the Obama/Clinton dynamic - there seems to be too much acrimony between them for them to make good running mates - but still, it was nice to hear. Instead of mudslinging, y'know?
Crap like this is why independent media gets my attention and my business.
How is that important? HOW?
No love and no respect,
Me
Also? I love KPFT and Democracy Now, but primary season isn't even over yet, and I am already tired of electioneering and such. Still. So much love for Gloria Steinem debating gender and race issues. Because instead of devolving into petty bickering, the participants actually, you know, communicated. I can't think any new dialogue between the two camps will make a difference in terms of the Obama/Clinton dynamic - there seems to be too much acrimony between them for them to make good running mates - but still, it was nice to hear. Instead of mudslinging, y'know?
no subject
Transcript (http://www.democracynow.org/2008/1/14/race_and_gender_in_presidential_politics).
no subject
That wasn't new with the civil rights movement. It actually started with the abolition movement and the first women's movement in the 1850s, which set that pattern in place. Women who were seeking to advance the state of women in the US turned their attention to stopping slavery (at the request of white, male abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison and Elizabeth Cady Stanton's husband, Henry Stanton), which was obviously the more pressing issue. They promised that once slavery was abolished, those men would push for women to get the vote along with black men. That didn't happen, and was a major sore spot for the early women's movement. They wound up fracturing into two separate organizations, so that what began in 1848 in Seneca Falls, New York, at the first Women's Rights Convention saw no fruition until 1920 and the passage of the 19th Amendment.
When the same thing happened with the second wave women's movement and the civil rights movement in the 1960s, women got seriously pissed off, which is why the "women's lib" movement of the 1970s was pretty vitriolic, and led a lot of women today still having a hard time calling themselves feminists. In a nutshell. ;)
I look forward to reading the debate. Thanks!
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't get some of the hardcore points of feminism at all. If we enjoy being women, why shouldn't we enjoy everything about it? There's enough crappy stuff that comes with the girl parts, so I'm making the most of the fun stuff.