"that they are transformative" What exactly does that mean? I know you aren't clear on it either, I guess I'll have to research the word a bit. "And that most people think their role in the next book will be as a clearinghouse or supplier, the equivalent of Bond's "M", rather than as direct combatants." I wonder why most people are drawing that conclusion? Maybe due to their less than pronounced role in book six. I certainly didn't go there after that, if anything, the presence of the twins at the train seeing Harry off in the end of HBP promised a definite combative role, or protective to say the least. I love the idea of combative protective twins! As long as they survive. And I think they will. Thanks for sharing all this!
Re: Weasleys
What exactly does that mean? I know you aren't clear on it either, I guess I'll have to research the word a bit.
"And that most people think their role in the next book will be as a clearinghouse or supplier, the equivalent of Bond's "M", rather than as direct combatants."
I wonder why most people are drawing that conclusion? Maybe due to their less than pronounced role in book six. I certainly didn't go there after that, if anything, the presence of the twins at the train seeing Harry off in the end of HBP promised a definite combative role, or protective to say the least.
I love the idea of combative protective twins! As long as they survive. And I think they will.
Thanks for sharing all this!